ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤

Reason to Doubt Islam: The Aorta Prophecy and the Satanic Verses

Islam teaches that the Qur’an is the perfect, unaltered word of God and that Muhammad was the final and infallible messenger. But when you examine some of the details in the Islamic sources themselves, serious contradictions and red flags begin to emerge.

1. The Aorta Prophecy – Qur’an 69:44–46

“And if Muhammad had made up some false sayings about Us,
We would have seized him by the right hand,
Then We would have cut his aorta.”
(Qur’an 69:44–46)

This verse makes it clear: if Muhammad had invented any part of the message, Allah would kill him by severing his aorta. That was the divine test.

Now, fast forward to the end of Muhammad’s life. According to Sahih Bukhari 4428, one of the most authentic hadith sources in Islam, Muhammad said on his deathbed:

“I feel my aorta is being severed from the poison I ate at Khaybar.”

So ask yourself:
• Why did Muhammad describe his death in exactly the same terms Allah said would happen if he were a false prophet?
• What are the odds that he would mention his aorta — a specific and uncommon term — during his dying moments?
• If Allah’s test was that a liar would die this way, and Muhammad himself said this was happening to him, what does that imply?

This is a serious problem for the claim that Muhammad was speaking for God. The Qur’an set the terms — and Muhammad’s death appears to have fulfilled them.

2. The Satanic Verses Incident

It gets worse. Early Islamic biographies — including Ibn Ishaq, the earliest biography of Muhammad — record that Muhammad once delivered verses saying that pagan gods could intercede. These verses praised the idols of Mecca:

“These are the exalted gharaniq (cranes), whose intercession is hoped for.”

These so-called Satanic Verses were later “withdrawn” by Muhammad, who claimed that Satan had made him speak them by mistake.

This means:
• Muhammad publicly delivered false revelation.
• He admitted it.
• He blamed it on Satan.

This is not a claim made by non-Muslims. This is found in Islamic historical sources — and no serious historian doubts that this tradition existed in early Islam. Whether or not it’s accepted by modern Muslims doesn’t change the implications.

If Muhammad:
• Delivered fake verses and later retracted them,
• And died saying the very thing Allah said would happen to a liar,

Then it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Muhammad failed the very test his own scripture laid out.

⸻

Conclusion:

When you put these two together — the aorta prophecy and the Satanic Verses — you’re not looking at a prophet protected from error. You’re looking at a man whose life and words show strong signs of fabrication, contradiction, and failure of divine protection.

Islam cannot stand up to this level of scrutiny. The cracks show not from outside attacks — but from within its own texts.

www.tg-me.com/jp/CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS Telegram Group/com.CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS/3894

734 viewsJun 7 at 22:42

Reason to Doubt Islam: The Aorta Prophecy and the Satanic Verses

Islam teaches that the Qur’an is the perfect, unaltered word of God and that Muhammad was the final and infallible messenger. But when you examine some of the details in the Islamic sources themselves, serious contradictions and red flags begin to emerge.

1. The Aorta Prophecy – Qur’an 69:44–46

“And if Muhammad had made up some false sayings about Us,
We would have seized him by the right hand,
Then We would have cut his aorta.”
(Qur’an 69:44–46)

This verse makes it clear: if Muhammad had invented any part of the message, Allah would kill him by severing his aorta. That was the divine test.

Now, fast forward to the end of Muhammad’s life. According to Sahih Bukhari 4428, one of the most authentic hadith sources in Islam, Muhammad said on his deathbed:

“I feel my aorta is being severed from the poison I ate at Khaybar.”

So ask yourself:
• Why did Muhammad describe his death in exactly the same terms Allah said would happen if he were a false prophet?
• What are the odds that he would mention his aorta — a specific and uncommon term — during his dying moments?
• If Allah’s test was that a liar would die this way, and Muhammad himself said this was happening to him, what does that imply?

This is a serious problem for the claim that Muhammad was speaking for God. The Qur’an set the terms — and Muhammad’s death appears to have fulfilled them.

2. The Satanic Verses Incident

It gets worse. Early Islamic biographies — including Ibn Ishaq, the earliest biography of Muhammad — record that Muhammad once delivered verses saying that pagan gods could intercede. These verses praised the idols of Mecca:

“These are the exalted gharaniq (cranes), whose intercession is hoped for.”

These so-called Satanic Verses were later “withdrawn” by Muhammad, who claimed that Satan had made him speak them by mistake.

This means:
• Muhammad publicly delivered false revelation.
• He admitted it.
• He blamed it on Satan.

This is not a claim made by non-Muslims. This is found in Islamic historical sources — and no serious historian doubts that this tradition existed in early Islam. Whether or not it’s accepted by modern Muslims doesn’t change the implications.

If Muhammad:
• Delivered fake verses and later retracted them,
• And died saying the very thing Allah said would happen to a liar,

Then it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Muhammad failed the very test his own scripture laid out.

⸻

Conclusion:

When you put these two together — the aorta prophecy and the Satanic Verses — you’re not looking at a prophet protected from error. You’re looking at a man whose life and words show strong signs of fabrication, contradiction, and failure of divine protection.

Islam cannot stand up to this level of scrutiny. The cracks show not from outside attacks — but from within its own texts.

BY ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤